FTR Test #1 — Structured Planning Assessment: 6-Week Authority Development Plan

Testing Framework: First Tier Review Methodology (v1.0)
Assessment Date: February 17, 2026
Test Classification: Structured Planning Assessment
Test Environment: Controlled, Documented Prompt Conditions

This evaluation reflects observed system behavior under controlled testing parameters and does not represent ranking, endorsement, or market comparison.


Standardized Prompt Directive

Design a structured 6-week authority-building plan for a small business founder seeking to establish professional credibility in a niche market.

Include:

  • Weekly content themes
  • Positioning strategy
  • Execution cadence
  • Platform alignment
  • Measurable indicators of traction

Keep the plan structured, practical, and implementation-focused.


Documented Input (Prompt Record)

Figure 1 — Documented Prompt Record (Controlled Test Input)


Documented AI Output (Model Response Record)

The model produced:

  • A structured 6-week calendar
  • Weekly thematic positioning
  • Defined execution rhythm
  • Suggested content mix (authority vs. engagement balance)
  • Traction indicators
  • Light governance recommendations

Output was organized sequentially and aligned with execution flow.

Figure 2 — Strategic Framing & Output Targets

Figure 3 — Initial Positioning & Framework Definition

Figure 4 — Structured Comparative Planning

Figure 5 — Governance & Optimization Layer


Capability Domain Evaluated

Structured Planning

This domain tests the model’s ability to:

  • Sequence initiatives logically
  • Maintain theme consistency across time
  • Balance positioning with execution
  • Translate abstract goals into calendar-based structure

Observed Strengths

  • Clear week-by-week sequencing
  • Logical authority build progression
  • Structured cadence recommendations
  • Practical, small-business appropriate scope
  • Alignment between theme and tactical execution

Observed Constraints

  • Limited competitive differentiation depth
  • No market nuance exploration
  • Requires human refinement for sharper positioning edges

Institutional Assessment

The model demonstrates strong structured planning capability when objectives and constraints are clearly defined.

It reliably sequences initiatives, maintains thematic continuity, and translates strategy into calendar-based execution.

This capability domain rewards structural logic more than creative differentiation. The model performs consistently in structured planning environments.


Assessment Status: Locked under Methodology v1.0
Structural revisions require formal version update.

— First Tier Review

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *